Wednesday, March 17, 2004

A Ghost From the Past

It was too wet to be outside. I had to find shelter. I headed toward the University.

I couldn't return "home," which is an almost absurd description for the place I had left; a garage converted into a bunkhouse for eight teenage boys with nowhere else to go. It was licensed by the state as a foster home, meaning the owner got a fat check each month. The more boys in the garage, the fatter the check. The preferred form of discipline was to pull the offender out of bed in the middle of the night and bounce him against the wall a few times. I stayed through the worst part of the winter. As soon as it seemed warm enough, I stole a good coat and new pair of boots, and walked away.

When I reached the campus, I first searched the dorms, and finally found what I sought; food trays in the abandoned dining room that had not been taken to the kitchen. Potato skins, rejected green vegetables, and cut-away fat took the edge off my hunger. I moved quickly and quietly, as it was too early in the evening to be prowling the dorms. Any minute one of the college boys might wander in and sound the alarm.

As I slipped out the door, I was startled by a strange sound coming from the large evergreen in front of the building. A lone blackbird was singing a sad song from deep within the branches. For a moment I considered joining my feathered brother under the protection of the pine needles, but the brightly lit dorm entrance caused me to choose the safety of the shadows instead.

The rain had changed from a light mist to a steady drizzle. I increased my pace. Next stop was the Newman Center. The Church was usually left open, and the confessional was a warm and dry place to hole up for the night. For some unknown reason, this night there were people there, doing some kind of strange ritual up by the altar. Students in pressed slacks and cashmere sweaters. They looked at my soggy state, and dripping long hair, and ordered me out of "their" Church.

I tried to swallow my rage as I once again stepped into the wet night. At the end of the street was a cyclone fence barring the way to the campus athletic field. I kicked it, and then kicked it again and again and again, until my foot was throbbing and my fury was exhausted. The noise had brought the occupants of the church out into the street where they stood making low guttural sounds in response to my display. As one of them move towards me, I moved the blade I had slipped into my hand so that it would gleam as it caught the rays of the streetlight. "Call the cops," someone muttered. Time to move on.

I kept to the alleys to avoid the cruiser's spotlight. I stopped and listened every few steps to make sure I was not being pursued. Miles later, I was moving towards the distant sound of music and laughter. A beautiful smiling face in an upper window of the YMCA invited me up. The dance had been going on for some time now. After a visit to the facilities in an attempt to dry myself with paper towels, I joined the beautiful smile at the window. We talked and kissed and held each other for one glorious hour. The lights came on, and the adult presence announced it was time to go home.

The beautiful smile got me a seat in her ride. Soon, the man behind the wheel had delivered all the teens back to their waiting families, except me. I asked him to drop me off back at the Y. Being a responsible adult type, he refused. I decided to take the risk. I told him I was on the run. He drove in silence, eventually turning into the driveway of a small ranch house with a well manicured yard. He invited me in. As I sat in the kitchen, I could hear a muffled conversation going on in the next room. The man reappeared with a towel, and showed me the way to the shower. When I stepped out, my clothes were gone, and a terrycloth robe was in their place.

When I emerged, the man led me to a bedroom containing a single bed and numerous boxes piled against two of the walls. On the bed were the contents of the pockets of my jeans, including my blade and the gum wrapper on which was scrawled the phone number of the beautiful smile.

I awoke to the smell of bacon. My clothes had reappeared, freshly laundered and folded. A place had been set for me at the kitchen table. The man served me bacon and eggs, and then sat and drank his coffee while he watched me eat.

As I put on my coat, he said "I have to insist you call your parents." Should I tell him I had not seen my parents for five years? Should I tell him about the garage? Better not. I walked to the phone, placing myself in the way of his line of sight, and dialed the number for time. Pressing the receiver hard against my ear so he could not hear the recording, I muttered a few words to the automated voice about being alright, and that I would call again soon. The man frowned when I hung up, but seemed satisfied there was nothing more he could do. He dropped me off at the Y, pressing a five dollar bill into my hand before putting the car in gear and vanishing into the morning traffic.

The sun was shining. I was rested and fed. My clothes were clean, and I had a new phone number stuffed in my jeans. The day was full of promise. As I sauntered along with a fresh spring in each step, I hummed Joni Mitchell's new song that I had heard for the first time the night before. I think it was Joni. Maybe it was the Beatles? Or maybe it was the blackbird?

J.
Blackbird singing in the dead of night
Take these broken wings and learn to fly
All your life
You were only waiting for this moment to arise.

Blackbird singing in the dead of night
Take these sunken eyes and learn to see
All your life
You were only waiting for this moment to be free.

Blackbird fly...Blackbird fly
Into the light of the dark black night.

Blackbird fly...Blackbird fly
Into the light of the dark black night.

Blackbird singing in the dead of night
Take these broken wings and learn to fly
All your life...
you were only waiting for this moment to arise...

Tuesday, March 16, 2004

The Bishop's Address

I recently mentioned my observations of the 220th Annual Convention of the Diocese of New Jersey, and quoted a brief excerpt from the message offered by the Rt. Rev. George E Councell. It is now available online;

Bishop's Address

Just a couple more excerpts;

While we design and implement a discernment process, there is urgent work to be done, and areas of mission and ministry where we need to stretch. First, I believe that it is urgent that we stretch to reach out to the impoverished people of the world, of our nation and in every neighborhood of our Diocese, especially so in the cities and urban areas. Pope Gregory served in a time of plague, pestilence and famine. To minister to hungry people, he opened up the papal granaries. He placed the Patrimony of Peter, lands and endowments, in the service of the poor. In one of his homilies, Gregory taught that we 'must honor the poor. Consider that those you see experiencing the world's contempt are within themselves friends of God. Share your possessions with them, so that in the end they may deign to share what they have with you. What you reach out to offer to a person lying prostrate on the ground you are giving to One who is seated in heaven.' (Be Friends of God, an English Version, by John Leinenueber)...

...Our conflict over the ordination and consecration of Bishop Gene Robinson and the ongoing debate over the development of rites for the blessing of same-sex unions have stretched us, our churches, our diocese, our province and the Anglican Communion. We have heard that our Communion with one another is stretched, strained, impaired, damaged, and/or broken. That these developments are very much present with us in New Jersey is evident in the resolutions that will come before us tomorrow. I am personally grateful that our diocese has not experienced the extremes of strident language and dramatic action that other dioceses and other provinces are experiencing. I have been stretched as a pastoral leader to serve and lead you in this complex moment in the history of Anglicanism and our Episcopal Church as I followed my conscience and what I believe to be the leading of the Holy Spirit when I took part in the Consecration of our brother Gene Robinson. I will continue to stretch, to reach out, to honor and respect and love and learn from my brothers and sisters who are gay and lesbian. I will continue to stretch, to reach out, to honor and respect and love and learn from my brothers and sisters who are angry, disappointed, or confused, and/or who believe that my own position and my actions are in error. Please. Let us wait with patience and hope for the report of the Lambeth Commission next fall. Let us wait with patience and hope for the work of our own House of Bishops on a process for the provision of supplemental episcopal pastoral care of those who are in distress, but who wish to remain in the Episcopal Church. In this, as in all things, I call upon us to remain at the Table of our Lord together. If he stretched out his arms of love on the hard wood of the cross, you and I cannot do less than to stretch out to embrace one another. Every Church is or will be facing these issues and conflicts. This is our way. I believe that God has his hand on this Church and that we are being stretched for greater glory and loving service...

...I love our Lord Jesus Christ, I love our Church, and I love being with you in New Jersey. Please accept my profound gratitude for entrusting me with this ministry as your shepherd in our Diocese. Unworthy as I am, I thank God and I thank you for this call. I will do my best to be a good shepherd and to handle the gifts and responsibilities that you handed over to me on St. Luke's Day last year. I ask for your prayers.

At the end of the day, I say to you that God is good. All the time. We know that because of God's heart, revealed to us in the passionate living, dying and rising of our Lord Jesus Christ. Hear now the words of Brian Wren in Hymn 603/604 and let them be our prayer as we engage the mission of the Servant Church.

When Christ was lifted from the earth, his arms stretched out above through every culture, every birth, to draw an answering love.

Still east and west his love extends and always, near and far, he calls and claims us as his friends and loves us as we are.

Where generation, class, or race divide us to our shame, he sees not labels, but a face, a person, and a name.

Thus freely loved, though fully known, may I in Christ be free to welcome and accept his own, as Christ accepted me.


Can I get an AMEN?

God is good...all the time!

J.

Monday, March 15, 2004

Presiding Bishop Responds to Actions in Ohio

The Most Rev. Frank Griswold, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, sent the following e-mail to every member of the House of Bishops this afternoon:

By their recent action in the Diocese of Ohio, five of our retired bishops and a bishop from the Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil have arrogated to themselves the right to perform episcopal and sacramental acts without the permission of the diocesan bishop. The claim that their action was pastoral and in accordance with a mandate from the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Primates of the Anglican Communion is contradicted by the statement of the Primates last October which states quite clearly that they, 'reaffirm the teaching of successive Lambeth Conferences that bishops must respect the autonomy and territorial integrity of dioceses and provinces other than their own,' and that they 'call on the provinces concerned to make adequate provision for episcopal oversight of dissenting minorities within their own area of pastoral care,' and that they should do so 'in consultation with the Archbishop of Canterbury on behalf of the Primates.'

Provisions for 'episcopal oversight of dissenting minorities' is thus clearly a matter to be resolved by the province. That is precisely what this church is seeking to do. In consultation with the Archbishop of Canterbury and his chancellor, our bishops have been considering a draft plan for episcopal pastoral care which they will address further when we gather for our spring meeting later this week in Texas.

With respect to this forthcoming meeting, the Archbishop of Canterbury said in a recent letter to me, 'My hope and prayer is that this meeting will offer generous and constructive ways forward within the constitutional and canonical structures of ECUSA that will guarantee Episcopal care for all and avoid further fragmentation, and the consequent distraction from our main task of proclaiming Christ.'

What is quite clear is that whatever pastoral response is agreed to, it must, as the Archbishop points out, be consistent with the 'constitutional and canonical structures of ECUSA.' Here I note that according to our Constitution:

A bishop shall confine the exercise of such office to the Diocese in which elected, unless requested to perform episcopal acts in another Diocese by the Ecclesiastical Authority thereof.[Article II,Sec.3]

Why, I am moved to ask, did these bishops decide that Confirmation of these persons was pastorally necessary at this moment and act without permission of the Bishop of Ohio? Given that the House of Bishops will meet later this week, I can only surmise that their intention is to co-opt the bishops' agenda and provoke a reaction that will appear sufficiently lacking in pastoral concern for 'dissenting minorities' to justify what they have done in the eyes of others. I trust that they will be disappointed in their hope and that the vast majority of bishops of this church-occupying the diverse center-will find a way forward that is clear and just in its principles, pastoral in its approach and responsive to the needs of the church in this present moment.

The Most Rev. Frank T. Griswold
Presiding Bishop and Primate
The Episcopal Church, USA
March 15, 2004


This is strong language for Bishop Griswold. From the reaction I have seen so far from some of the AAC, the implications of his words are not sinking in. Canterbury is not pleased by these actions. To be an Anglican means that one remains in communion with Canterbury. If and when the AAC does break from ECUSA (and with the level of hatred I see coming from the AAC directed towards Bishop Griswold and ECUSA, I cannot see how they will remain a part of this Church much longer), it is going to be difficult for them to be recognized by Canterbury in light of these events.

J.

Fear of the Feminine

I just stumbled across an interesting article on gender roles, Fear of the Feminine, by Nancy Myer Hopkins.

Here's an excerpt;

"What is driving the intensity of our current church infighting?" Is it really just about what people do sexually with each other?

Probably not. A more likely reason for a significant amount of the negativism is that same-sex relationships violate the rules laid down by all patriarchal cultures about how men and women should behave in relationship to one another. The same rules also narrowly define acceptable relationships between people of the same sex.

Looking through this lens, we can see that the offenses pile up rapidly. If a lesbian woman does not need a man to satisfy her, protect her and keep her in line, the threat of the feminine is there; if a gay man is able to access the feminine side of his being, his every move can be considered suspect and an affront to many. If long-term relationships between two people of the same sex toss the age-old formulas attached to male dominance and female submission out the window, what are we left with? And if we must allow people who are partnered in this way to live openly and with our blessing -- so that we can't pretend that this is not happening -- how offensive is that? It is only offensive if we continue to cling to a patriarchal framework which keeps the feminine in her "proper" place.
I think this author is on to something. She goes on to compare the human body language of dominance and submission and the body language of dogs. Drawing from media ad examples, Hopkins makes a convincing case that "...many women have subliminally absorbed the idea that to be sexy, desirable and attractive, one must be submissive. It is no accident that troublesome females are called bitches..."

Take a look. Let's hear your reaction.

J.

The Plot Thickens

There has been a new development within the ongoing saga within the Episcopal Church. It appears that six congregations gathered in Ohio for Confirmations, but the Diocesan Bishop was not invited to participate. For those of you who prefer not to register to view the article, I'll provide the most relevant excerpts from a Cleveland paper, The Plain Dealer, written by Mark Rollenhagen;

...Six area congregations unhappy with Bishop J. Clark Grew II's support of the election and consecration of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire broke church protocol and brought in retired bishops from outside the diocese to conduct the confirmation service.

They secretly planned the service and held it in an Orthodox church so that Grew could not stop it and they later could not be accused of holding an improper service in an Episcopal Church...

The Washington-based council (the American Anglican Council) called the fact that five retired bishops from other states and one active bishop from Brazil crossed diocesan boundaries to conduct a confirmation service without permission from the local bishop "an unprecedented and historic move."
This is a troubling development, for a few reasons. First of all, such actions are simply not allowed, according to the Constitution of the Episcopal Church;

Article II, Sec. 3. A Bishop shall confine the exercise of such office to the Diocese in which elected, unless requested to perform episcopal acts in another Diocese by the Ecclesiastical Authority thereof, or unless authorized by the House of Bishops, or by the Presiding Bishop by its direction, to act temporarily in case of need within any territory not yet organized into Dioceses of this Church.
The presence of a bishop from Brazil is also troubling. It brings to mind the Chapman letter, which outlined a plan by the AAC to replace the Episcopal Church with their own form of conservative Christianity. When it became obvious that they would lose their property, they backpedaled, and even formed a new entity, The Network, which is the AAC dressed in new vestments. One of the strategies is to use foreign bishops who are outside the authority of the Episcopal Church.

Keep in mind that these are the same people that have been claiming that the Church is going to hell in a handbasket since the '79 Book of Common Prayer was introduced and women were admitted to holy orders. They are fixated on some imaginary golden age of the Church, in which "Father Knows Best" and the pews were full of Cleaver clones. Not only is this past they desire to conserve a work of fiction, it also refuses to acknowledge the reality of change. We are certainly informed by our past, but we also "strain forward to what lies ahead."

So why is Bishop Robinson the line in the sand? They could not rally much support around prayer book revision. Many people consider the '79 book to be an improvement. They couldn't rant too loudly about women's ordination without risking the alienation of half of the human race. So, the sacrificial lamb became gay and lesbian Christians. They grabbed a handful of bible verses, verses that can only be "true" according to their interpretation, rallied support from those who think homosexuals are "icky," and marched lock-step on a crusade to "save the Church." Never mind that they have to walk on the backs of innocent victims along the way. It is about being "right," and relationships be damned.

Another troubling consideration is the precedent this will set for the future. I recall one bishop whose visitation I always dreaded, because he simply could not chant, but thought he could. In the future, will I be able to request "alternative episcopal oversight" on the grounds that my people require a bishop whose voice brings to mind an angelic choir instead of a cat fight?

Crossing diocesan boundaries without permission of the Ordinary is not only rude and arrogant; it also ignores the checks and balances that we have in place for very good reasons. Wandering foreign bishops have caused much turmoil in our past.

I think it is quite obvious why this incident happened in Ohio when it did. Later this month, the House of Bishops will meet. There will be discussions on "alternative episcopal oversight." The AAC, in their new disguise as the Network, will now come to this meeting with their right to send any bishop of their choice across diocesan boundaries a fait accompli.

J.

There you go man,
Keep as cool as you can.
Face piles
And piles
Of trials
With smiles.
It riles them to believe
That you perceive
The web they weave
And keep on thinking free.


-Moody Blues


UPDATE: The Ven. Mark Hollingsworth Jr., Bishop-Elect of Ohio and the Rt. Rev. J. Clark Grew, II, Bishop of Ohio, respond to the Extra-Canonical Confirmation Service.

Sunday, March 14, 2004

My Spin on Convention

I have just returned from the Annual Convention of the Diocese of New Jersey. I attended as an observer as I am not canonically resident. It was held in an ideal facility; a convention center in Wildwood, New Jersey.

I had a grand time. Their voting process here is rather complex, requiring 6 ballots. I didn't mind. As I couldn't vote, each ballot allowed me ample opportunity to browse through the numerous exhibits.

Near the end of the convention, there was about 45 minutes of discussion regarding a resolution (2004-4), and an amendment to the resolution (2004-5), having to do with human sexuality issues. To keep this in perspective, this was 45 minutes out of about 8 hours over two days in session. About 10 people spoke, the amended resolution passed by what sounded like a large majority, and the business session moved on. No shouting, no new information, simply a fairly civil disagreement. Those wanting us to condemn the actions of the last General Convention voiced the same points heard numerous times; that homosexuals needed healing, that homosexuality was against the created order as described in Genesis, that "the vast majority of the Anglican Communion has broken communion with us" (I don't have enough fingers and toes to count the number of times I've heard this gross exaggeration). One speaker even suggested that we should consider homosexuality the same way we view alcoholism. As I said, nothing new.

What I did notice was that those making these comments, (with the exception of one pompous rear posterior who will remain unidentified), appeared quite sincere. I honestly think they believed that they were telling us something we didn't already know. I can respect that, even while I sincerely believe that they are quite mistaken.

However, there were a few delegates at this convention, both clergy and lay, who I know to be gay, and I could not help but wince when I heard some of these statements. They were quite hurtful. That may not have been the intention of the speakers, but it was the result just the same. If the way to unity requires us to scapegoat even one of our brothers or sisters, I think the cost of such unity is too high.

These speakers were held accountable for their words. A number of people spoke quite eloquently for the amendment. It seemed to me that as the words got more hurtful, more and more people moved quietly to the microphone to respond. This didn't take away the sting of the words, but something good came out of it; more voices were offered to counter the pain, and the amendment passed.

Seen in its entirety, it was a brief moment within the whole of the convention. I have chosen to comment on it because this morning, when I arrived at the parish, I was greeted with, "Have you seen the papers?"

It appears the press decided to put their own spin on what happened in Wildwood over the weekend. How lovely.

Tonight I decided to check out what some of the other spin doctors had to say. Kendall Harmon mentioned it, with no commentary, but those making comments could not resist the smell of fresh blood, it appears. (How can you read that stuff, Karen? My blood pressure can't take it!)

That was more than enough for me. Instead of taking the bait, I'm saying just a bit about it here instead, for my own sake as much as for anyone who may be reading these words.

Let me close with a quote from Bishop George Counsell from his sermon during our Eucharist on Friday;

Listening is a profound act of service. I hope that, when we come away from our consideration of these resolutions tomorrow, we will be built up by extraordinary care, lavish respect, and sacrificial love. "You know the Gentiles those whom they recognize as their rulers lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. But it is not so among you;..." (Mark 10:42-43). Let us conduct our debates so as to show ourselves and our world that the Servant Church still serves, even when in disagreement with itself; and especially as we strive for justice and peace and respect the dignity of every human being.

From my perspective, I feel that, for the most part, the Bishop's hopes were realized, regardless of what the spin doctors say. This is a fine diocese; a Servant Church indeed. I may just decide to stick around for awhile.

J.

Thursday, March 11, 2004

Grace

I think that this is what Christianity is all about. I may be wrong. But that is what I have learned from life so far.

Grace; unmerited favor. Can't be earned. Can't be bought. A freely given gift of unwarranted love. To be loved because I am.

My children taught me grace. When they first emerged into this bright world, they needed to be held, to be cuddled, to feel gentle hands assuring them that they were safe; that they were loved.

When my youngest son was born, the nurse gave him to me to hold. I walked over to a corner of the room away from the bright lights, and rocked him in my arms as I whispered words of joy. He shook his tiny head, and struggled to open his eyes. We gazed into one another. Time stopped. Nothing but the flow of love between us existed. A moment of grace. A moment that seemed so natural, so spontaneous, and in some ways, so familiar. I had been to that place before. But I couldn't remember when, or where.

As the years went by, the grace flowed. As love was given, it was now returned; not because I was such a perfect father, or the most handsome, or the smartest; but because I was Dad.

This is the root of my understanding of our relationship with God. God is madly, head-over-heals in love with us, and woos us, and all of creation, into being, because we are. I have a hard time holding on to this foundational relationship. In day to day life, it doesn't fit very well.

Many of us learned of grace at an early age from our families. One day, we were sent off to school, to be educated and socialized. We learned new rules. We must earn respect. Life is about competition. Happiness is found in being better; smarter, faster, stronger, funnier. We saw the lives of adults in a new, frightening, stark light. If we were to be loved, we had to perform. The "real" world was not about grace at all. It was all about competition.

As Wordsworth would say;

The world is too much with us; late and soon,
Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers;
Little we see in Nature that is ours;
We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!
This Sea that bares her bosom to the moon,
The winds that will be howling at all hours,
And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers,
For this, for everything, we are out of tune;
It moves us not.--Great God! I'd rather be
A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn;
So might I, standing on this pleasant lea,
Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;
Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea;
Or hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn.


William is a bit more strident than I feel right now, but he gives voice to some of my frustrations. When I look deep within myself, I find a weary soul, tired of striving. I don't have many glimpses of grace that would make me less forlorn.

Grace is still there, but some days I seem to have misplaced her. I know that more study, more good deeds, more striving will satisfy my need to "do something" about this tragedy, but I also know that path is a dead end. It's more a matter of remembering.

Would I rather be a pagan? I don't think so. For me, Jesus Christ is the window, the icon, by which I glimpse something that is very close to what I'm trying to remember. I need an icon, an image, a symbol, to help ideas, longings, and glimpsed memories to become concrete and real. Christ is that icon for me.

The historical Christ is a powerful example, but left to myself, he could easily become no more than another heroic figure from the past. I need something more concrete; something that will engage me in the here and now, something, or someone, who will help me keep grace in sight.

The tool, the icon, the window that I have discovered is the Church. As Christ is the outward and visible sign of God, so the Church is intended to be the outward and visible sign of Christ. The Church is first and foremost sacramental; the sign of an inward and spiritual grace.

The problem with the Church is that it is made up of frail and flawed people like myself who have also been indoctrinated into the ways of "getting and spending." Some critics of Protestant Christianity have claimed that it is "the merchant's religion." I think there's some truth in that statement.

Don't misunderstand me; I love the Church. She continues to be a wonderful conduit of grace. But some of the messages that come from her seem so lacking in grace.

For instance, I just don't know what to do with the whole idea of hell. I'm sorry, but if heaven is supposed to be a place of eternal bliss, how could I be there and know even one soul is burning in hell? It would certainly ruin my bliss. There's something twisted in the way hell is often presented. It sounds like more competition; the goal in life is to get your ticket, and to hell with everyone else. I fail to see the grace in that. I don't suggest I know anything about the next life. I choose to simply admit my ignorance, and try to look for grace in this life, and leave the next one in the hands of God.

Then there is the idea, articulated in its most extreme form as extra ecclesiam nulla salus est, "outside the Church there is no salvation." This takes on various forms today; one of the most popular being "unless you accept Jesus Christ is your personal Lord and Savior, you are not saved." The gift of grace has strings attached? Having directed quite a few non-profits over the years, one lesson I have learned is that a gift with strings attached is not a gift. Just say no.

Obviously the gift has to be accepted; recognized and received for what it is. But this is more a matter of awareness than a striving to earn it, it seems to me. I struggle with the image of God as the great coin machine in the sky; insert the right prayer, the right devotion, the right action in the slot, and bing! swoosh! clunk! out comes a bottle of grace, or a packet of forgiveness. Is our relationship with God primarily a transaction? Is God a "problem" to "solve"? Or are we puppets in a divine game in which the winners are defined by the existence of losers? If so, then indeed I would "rather be a Pagan suckled in a creed outworn..." I'll choose standing in awe before a mystery any day.

I once heard a preacher say in a sermon, "The Church is a harlot, but she's all we've got." Harsh, but it dances near the truth, I think. Yet, I find that I cannot give up on the Church, anymore than I can give up on humanity. I don't imagine that I can personally initiate any lasting changes in the Church. The only thing I know I can change is Jake. To recall the gift of grace, it is helpful to return to the places where I last saw her. And I have seen her so many times on the faces of those with whom I share this journey; my brothers and sisters in Christ. It is within this community that grace flows. Sometimes, in the midst of the liturgy or a study, I catch the eye of another, and I see that place I shared with my newborn son. Such moments fill me with joy and a sense of peace; God's grace continues to flow among us.

Can this grace ripple outward to embrace all of creation? I think it can, and I think it does. We just don't see it, because we are too busy convincing each other that grace is a commodity, and we have a monopoly on the market. Our grace is "special" because we have it and you don't. Silly creatures, aren't we?

We can transform this world, if we are conduits of grace, giving and receiving as the hands of Christ in the world today.

J.

She carries a pearl
In perfect condition
What once was hers
What once was friction
What left a mark
No longer stains

Because grace makes beauty
Out of ugly things

Grace finds beauty
In everything

Grace finds goodness
In everything

-U2
(thanks, Joe!)

Wednesday, March 10, 2004

For the Sake of the World

On Sunday's BBC Breakfast with Frost, Sir David Frost interviewed Frank Griswold, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church USA.

The conclusion is worth noting;

DAVID FROST: Is it possible do you think, Bishop Griswold, that in the end the only way that these deep divisions can be solved is by saying okay, no more Anglican union as such, we'll just be a sort of federation of different churches? Is that the only way to solve this one?

BISHOP GRISWOLD: I think it's worth pointing out that the Church is for the sake of the world, not for the sake of its own self preservation. My sense is that if we draw deeply from the well spring of grace and goodness and divine compassion that is at the very heart of the Church's life, we will find a way to continue forward with our different perspectives.

I think it's worth pointing out that Anglicanism, historically, was an effort to contain radical differences, a reformation consciousness in a Catholic consciousness within a context of common prayer, in which one point of view was not the answer but the ability to come together around word and sacrament.

And I think that continues to be the heart and centre of the Anglican experience and that, I think, could carry us through these difficult times.
Well said, Most Reverend Sir.

J.

The Illusion of "Us" and "Them"

This morning, I had the unexpected pleasure of walking the labyrinth. This is a spiritual exercise that I was first introduced to while serving in California. If you want to know more about it, I highly recommend Walking the Sacred Path: Rediscovering the Labyrinth as a Spiritual Tool by Dr. Lauren Artress of Grace Cathedral, San Francisco.

Another group needed to use the hall, so we folded up the portable labyrinth (it is on a 20' x 20' piece of canvas), and began rearranging the room. A woman who had arrived for the next event approached me, and engaged me in the following conversation;

"Is this a Catholic church?"

The factual answer to this can become quite complicated, but since I was juggling a boom box, a handful of CDs and a pile of books, I went for simplicity..."Um, well kinda, but not really. We're Episcopalian."

"Oh." This was followed by silence, which allowed me to almost reach the door...

"Why do Wiccans worship Satan?"

Such a question is not unusual when you wear a dog collar, but this time I was caught off guard. I had seven minutes left before the next group started, and the food still needed to be put away. Yet, either this person was really trying to get my attention, or this was a teaching moment. Either one took priority over the food.

"The Wiccans that I have known don't worship Satan. Most of them don't even believe in Satan. It is an earth-centered tradition, which is very healthy in many respects."

"Well, I was talking to some Wiccans, and they hate God."

"Are you sure they were Wiccans?"

"I think that's what they were. Maybe they were Satanists."

"Oh. I don't know much about Satanists. I've never known anyone who claimed that title."

"How could anyone hate God?"

"I don't know. Maybe they see Satan as the flip side?"

"The flip side?"

"Yea...maybe they see God as the God of both good and evil."

"God can't be evil."

"You're right. But sometimes I wonder if I understand evil, or Satan."

"Wouldn't anyone who hates God be evil?"

"Maybe the God they hate is the God of dualism; the idea that God and Satan are engaged in some kind of cosmic fisticuffs. Or maybe they are just really twisted, or just like to shock people..."

We talked for a few more minutes until more people arrived. I offered to continue the conversation another time. I'm not sure any answers were given, but I wonder if that was the real motivation for the conversation anyway. We'll see.

It did give me a reason to reflect on my experience of things that are often labeled as "Pagan." I was involved with an inter-faith group for awhile. I have to be honest and say that the most rude, arrogant and mean-spirited members of this group were some of the Christians. The most caring, fun-loving and healthy members were some variety of Pagan.

I suspect that this is the result of generations of Christians considering any tradition but their own to be "of Satan." What many Christians seem to miss is that this attitude makes it impossible for anyone to hear their stories about their tradition. They are seen as arrogant and self-righteous, and unwilling to educate themselves about other faith traditions. To some degree, I think this criticism is true. We respond from our fear of the unknown. We judge other faiths by the degree that they resemble Christianity.

My lovely wife was nurtured back to life, both a spiritual and a physical life, by some wonderful people who many would label as "Pagan." She is a Christian today because of the love of God expressed through Pagans. Imagine that. She has told her story on her site, Pilgrim's Progress.

I think we need to set aside our "us" and "them" thinking. It may have been effective in other times, but it simply doesn't work anymore. I rejoice that a person is following any spiritual path, and believe that we share a common passion. It seems to me that in order to treat another with the dignity and respect due one who is created in the image of God requires us to meet them where they are in their spiritual journey, and not try to drag them to where we think they should be.

We listen to their story. We share our story. We look for the places that God's story intersects our stories. We laugh together, and maybe even cry; maybe even pray. If we listen closely, we may just encounter God in the most unexpected places.

J.

Monday, March 08, 2004

God Hates Shrimp

This is making the rounds on some of the mailing lists, so I thought I'd mention it here.

From Leviticus 11:9-12 and Deuteronomy 14:9-11, it appears that faithful Christians need to start closing down the local Popeyes and Red Lobster. God hates shrimp, and lobster as well, so we must adhere to the authority of the scriptures, and protect the sanctity of our restaurants.

T-shirts are available.

As a refresher, here are a few other things it appears God hates;

God hates pork chops. (Lev 11:7)

God hates cheeseburgers. (Deut. 14:21)

God hates poly-cotton blends. (Lev. 19:19)

God hates shaving. (Lev. 19:27)

God hates tattoos. (Lev. 19:28)

God hates the handicapped. (Lev 21:17-19)

Ironically, it appears that we got it wrong regarding one reform. God loves slavery. (Lev. 25:44-46)

If we are to purify this decadent world we live in and bring it back in line with biblical standards, we had better get busy. We have lots of work to do. Don't take any shortcuts, though. No fair picking and choosing which biblical standard you are going to champion. God hates that, or at least that was the impression I got the last time She discussed the matter with me.

J.

Sunday, March 07, 2004

Get Up Off Your Knees

As I was browsing in the Cathedral bookstore last week, Raewynne Whiteley brought to my attention a new book she has co-edited, Get Up Off Your Knees; Preaching the U2 Catalogue. I bought a copy (and got Raewynne to sign it, of course!).

Here's an excerpt from the foreword by Eugene Peterson, Professor Emeritus, Regent College, Vancouver;

...it comes as no surprise that substantial elements of the Christian church have responded to U2 with something less than enthusiasm, responses ranging from wary detachment to condenscension to outright rejection. For even though three members of the band are candid and unqualified in their witness as followers of Jesus Christ, they have little patience with media-driven aspects of the Christian religion and a church and culture that shows little concern for justice and poverty and sickness, especially the out of control epidemic of AIDS in Africa. In every age, religion has served as a convenient cover among an astonishing number of people for cozy self-righteousness and a judgmental rejection of suffering sinners. Prophetic voices that challenge the people of God to live "in accordance with the scriptures," scriptures that are especially vocal about care for the poor, the suffering, and the disreputable, have never received cordial treatment from people who use religion to cocoon themselves from reality.

Royalties go to The AIDS Support Organization (TASO) in Uganda.

I went out and got their older Best Of album to play on the way home today. Great stuff...and indeed a prophetic voice . Buy the book!

J.

Friday, March 05, 2004

What is Worship?

A comment the other day got me to thinking about how I understand worship. To be quite honest, I often feel like my perspective is becoming the minority view. That doesn't mean it is wrong, though, does it? Unpopular, maybe, but not necessarily wrong.

I have always understood worship to be our offering a sacrifice of praise and thanksgivings to God. Period. It's not a meeting. It's not a class. It's not about fellowship. It's not even about having a "spiritual experience." It's not about us at all. It's about God.

Out of all of creation, we know of one creature that is conscious of the existence of a Creator. Sometimes, I think that is why I exist; to offer praise and thanksgiving to God on the behalf of a silent creation. That is my role in the cosmos.

Part of the offering of thanksgiving is to participate in God's transformation of this world. I understand that means ushering new people into the kingdom. And, I understand that having innovative and inspiring worship, that offers powerful "spiritual experiences," accessible teachings, and a strong feel of community is important if we expect new folks to stick around. It's a good idea to address felt needs, as long as they don't replace real needs. People who are new to worship are expected to bring with them a consumer mentality. Wanting the biggest bang for the buck, asking "What have you done for me lately?" is not unusual. But, if this kind of thinking is allowed to become the primary focus of worship, my experience is that something quite important can become lost. We have put the focus on the community, and taken it off of God.

So, when someone tells me, "I'm just not being fed in our worship," I bite my tongue, and say nothing. What I want to say is. "Guess what? It's not about you." But that would be too harsh, I suppose.

Yes, I think we are to offer the best of our creativity, music and art to God in our worship. But too often, this becomes a performance, with people playing to people. In my tradition, about 50 years ago, we started pulling our altars away from the wall, so the celebrant could face the people. Some days I wonder about the wisdom of that move. Now the temptation is for the celebrant to begin making eye contact with the congregation during the Eucharist prayers. It can become a dialogue between people, with God assigned the role of passive observer, at best. My understanding is that the celebrant is but a conduit, and so is to be transparent; one reason among others for the vestments; they take away the individuality. When the altar is against the wall, the celebrant faces the same way as the people, with his or her back to the people. The focal point is God, with the celebrant being a transparent representative of the people.

Quite often some kind of teaching, fellowship and some form of spiritual experience will occur during worship. But they are icing on the cake. When I enter worship with clarity about who I am, and whose I am, I know my place in the kingdom. I am the one who offers praise and thanksgiving to God on the behalf of a silent creation. The role requires sacrifice, as I have to set aside my own needs; I have to take the focus off of me. But dying to self, as an offering to God, is the way of this kingdom. As Francis would say, "It is in dying that we are born to eternal life."

J.

It is right, and a good and joyful thing, always and everywhere
to give thanks to you, Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth.

Therefore we praise you, joining our voices with Angels and Archangels,
and with all the company of heaven, who forever sing this hymn
to proclaim the glory of your Name:

Holy, holy, holy Lord, God of power and might.
Heaven and earth are full of your glory.
Hosanna in the highest.
Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.
Hosanna in the highest.


Silence is not always golden

Allen, over on The Right Christians wonders why only conservative Christians were invited to give testimony on the proposed federal marriage amendment. Could it be that the conservatives are considered the voice of all of Christendom?

Thanks to Religious Liberal for pointing me to a few progressive voices that are willing to speak up. Alan Jones, Dean of Grace Cathedral, is quoted. He is the author of many books, including A Passion for Pilgrimage, from which I pulled some lengthy quotes in the Longing for Home piece.

I hope that more voices might speak out from the perspective of seeing God calling all people to become citizens of the kingdom, not just those who fit our cookie-cutter design of what it means to be Christian.

On a completely unrelated note, the first two volumes of Daniel Matt's translation of The Zohar are now available, for those interested in such things. I"ve ordered both, but haven't looked at them yet. The hype is that this may become THE translation.

J.

Wednesday, March 03, 2004

11th Commandment?

It appears that the Methodist Church UK and Ship of Fools are seeking suggestions for the 11th Commandment.

Sounds like a cute gimmick, but do we really need more rules?

Ok, in the spirit of the thing, here are some suggestions.

Thou shalt not ever ever ever cook cauliflower in a confined space causing others to endure the scent of decomposing vegetation.

Thou shalt not allow the animals into my office.

If said animals are inadvertently allowed into my office, thou shalt not use the fact that the top of my desk sometimes resembles a litter box as an excuse for their appalling behavior.

Thou shalt not go to Mexico and forget to call Dad for three weeks (yes, son, this means you!).

Thou shalt not lust after cars you cannot afford (this includes that sweet black Cobra with the supercharger and the rebuilt engine with only 200 miles on it and the black leather interior and low profile wheels that they are asking half what it's worth and is one of a kind so would really be an investment....).

Thou shalt not sing Rocky Racoon in the car unless alone (why everyone groans is beyond me, but obviously it causes pain to others, so needs to be on this list).

Thou shalt not invite the Jehovah Witnesses in just to play with their heads.

Thou shalt not test the endurance of the garbage disposal with various non-organic items.

Thou shalt not smack the young man who thinks it's funny to blow bubbles in the chalice.

Thou shalt not make announcements in the middle of the liturgy.

And finally, the one that may have the most universal appeal...

Thou shalt not spam.

J.

...In times of confusion...

Yesterday, the clergy of the diocese were offered a presentation entitled "The Authority of Scripture in Times of Confusion."

The presentation was given by John Koening, Professor of New Testament at General Theological Seminary, NYC. He previously taught at Princeton and Union Seminaries. Koenig is a graduate of Concordia Senior College (A.B.), Concordia Seminary in St. Louis (B.D.); and Union Theological Seminary in New York City (Th.D.)

Koenig has written six books. They include: New Testament Hospitality, Rediscovering New Testament Prayer and, most recently, The Feast of the World's Redemption.

He began his presentation by highlighting the current climate regarding claims to the authority of scripture. He summarized this climate with the phrase "a hermeneutic of suspicion and distrust." In this, he is referring to the variety of views of scriptural authority rather than the texts themselves. When anyone starts quoting scripture today, it is almost a requirement that one look up their credentials before giving their thoughts serious consideration. Where the writer stands in the Church on various issues has become the primary consideration.

There are currently two divergent views of scriptural authority. Koenig broke them up as the "Evangelical/Traditional" view and the "Progressive/Liberal" view. As was pointed out, these terms do not fully express the current diversity. As but one example, in the first half of the 20th century, there was a school of thought that was often labeled as "Liberal Evangelical," which felt that modern biblical scholarship was a tool that would enable evangelism. This view does not fit into the split offered by Koenig. But of course, there are two kinds of people in the world, aren't there? Those who split us up into two groups, and those who don't!

He defined the characteristics of the first group as those who see the bible as primarily a book of answers. It is unique, and cannot be categorized in the same manner as any other book, as it is "inspired." It is the different ways that this "inspiration" is defined that can be troublesome. The extreme view of the scriptures being inspired is appropriately called Fundamentalism; the text is infallible and inerrant.

The characteristics of the latter group were defined as those who see the scriptures functioning as a primary witness of the saving acts of God, and brings us into a participatory role in these acts. To say it another way, rather than an answer book, the bible is seen as a place where we meet God. The extreme view in this group would be that the bible is a "good book," among others, which offers a collection of Christian themes and helps us by inspiring us to practice these virtues. The troublesome area here becomes what to do with those parts that do not address these themes. Are they to be simply cut out or ignored? Beyond this, there is also something uncomfortable to me considering these themes as examples only; somehow that seems to not be enough when speaking of what happened in the Incarnation, Crucifixion and Resurrection. Something "new" happened, and it is not in the same category as the example left to us by Gandhi or Socrates. Still thinking about this. Maybe more on it another time.

Koenig then offered two images of how scriptural authority works for Christians. The first image was "savoring;" that we slowly "inwardly digest" the text. He emphasized patience and specific disciplines and practices that will facilitate in our "savoring;" specifically, Lectio Divina, among others.

One of the examples he used was Dame Julian of Norwich. He pointed out that her work is full of allusions to scripture, and stated that her visions had to be interpreted in the light of scripture. I'm not so sure if that example works for me.

My understanding of mysticism is that a mystic is both a conservative and a revolutionary simultaneously. The mystical experience is often beyond the confines of words and thoughts. To attempt to articulate this experience to others, one must use the terms and symbols of their tradition, as there are no other tools at hand. In this way, the mystic does indeed affirm the tradition. At the same time, the mystical experience pushes the boundaries of these same traditions, as they are rooted in an experience of the divine that is not limited by previous revelations.

I mention this because I feel as if the mystical tradition is one area that is too casually dismissed by those who insist that the "revealed truth" of the past must be considered more authorative than the revealed truth of those who encounter the living God today. Maybe more about that another time as well.

Another important point, to me, that Koenig mentioned was to emphasize once again the participatory aspect of reading scripture. Using the road to Emmaus account, he points out that Christ is with us as we engage the text; that in many ways, the scriptures have a sacramental place in the life of the community, that the Spirit within us, the same Spirit who "rolls through all things," becomes known through the process.

He also mentioned the importance of prophecy in the early Church; that there was a tradition of someone being "inspired" with an interpretation, and offering that to the community. This brings to mind my brief excursion into Pentecostalism when I was young. I think there are some serious problems with this use of prophecy. On the other hand, the term "prophetic" is often used to describe causes of social justice which actually have little to do with biblical interpretation. I was drawn to consider again the possibility that the mystics offer yet another form of prophecy, which would not necessarily be Pentecostal or from the Social Gospel. Hmmm....

His final image was "calling," a theme used often by Paul. We are a people called. The savoring leads to a recognition of the call, which is seen in the context of community (Romans 12). The text leads us to action; an exercise of the gifts given to the body. This resonated with me, as I have always considered the Church's primary role as "equipping the saints for ministry." The "inner nurture" aspect of this equipping needs to be done, but it seems to me that in many places, the nurturing has become primary; "we have to take care of ourselves first....," and of course, that care goes on indefinitely, with the member being just one more class, one more discipline, one more divine experience away from being ready for ministry.
That's a pet peeve of mine, as it can so easily deteriorate into a country club mentality.

Returning to Koenig's presentation; the afternoon was reserved for small group discussion. Sometimes I find Anglican clergy so frustrating. Everyone is sooooo careful not to offend anyone else, that any issues are tiptoed around; usually resulting in a very cerebral discussion, that is nice, but does not tap into the passion potential; at least it doesn't for me, the unapologetic INFP that I am.

My "hermeneutic of suspicion" was working overtime. I thought I detected an agenda in someone else's comments, and let my passion come out. Not wise for a new member of this particular clergy club I suppose. I did go and speak with the man afterwards, and apologized for any offense I may have given. I need to reflect on that internal passion, and why it seems to be so close to the surface lately. Maybe it's just paranoia? It feels like more. Maybe more on this as well another time.

J.

I appeal to you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.

Do not be conformed to this world but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that you may prove what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.

For by the grace given to me I bid every one among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith which God has assigned him.

- Romans 12:1-3

Monday, March 01, 2004

A New Resource for Lent

I've noticed some interest concerning Lent on other sites. Here is a brief description offered by Times and Seasons, which is a draft of a possible future Common Worship book being developed by the Church of England:

Introduction to the Season:
Lent may originally have followed Epiphany, just as Jesus’ sojourn in the wilderness followed immediately on his baptism, but it soon became firmly attached to Easter, as the principal occasion for baptism and for the reconciliation of those who had been excluded from the church’s fellowship for apostasy or serious faults. This history explains the characteristic notes of Lent: self-examination, penitence, self-denial, study, and preparation for Easter, to which almsgiving has traditionally been added.

Now is the healing time decreed
For sins of heart and word and deed,
When we in humble fear record
The wrong that we have done the Lord (Latin, before 12 Cent)

As the candidates for baptism were instructed in Christian faith, and as penitents prepared themselves, through fasting and penance, to be readmitted to communion, the whole Christian community was invited to join them baptismal their process of study and repentance, whose extension over forty days would remind them of the forty days that Jesus spent in the wilderness, being tested by Satan.

Ashes are an ancient sign of penitence; from the middle ages it became the custom to begin Lent by being marked in ash with the sign of the cross. The calculation of the forty days has varied considerably in Christian history. It is now usual in the west to count them continuously to the end of Holy Week, so beginning Lent on the sixth Wednesday before Easter, Ash Wednesday. Liturgical dress is the simplest possible. Churches are kept bare of flowers and decoration. The Gloria in excelsis is not used. The fourth Sunday of Lent (Laetare or Refreshment Sunday) was allowed as a day of relief from the rigour of Lent, and the Feast of the Annunciation almost always falls in Lent; these intervals are the background to the modern observance of Mothering Sunday.

As Holy Week approaches, the atmosphere of the season darkens; the readings begin to anticipate the story of Christ’s suffering and death, and the reading of the Passion Narrative gave to the Fifth Sunday its name of Passion Sunday. There are many devotional exercises which may be used in Lent and Holy Week outside the set liturgy. The Stations of the Cross, made popular in the west by the Franciscans after they were granted custody of the Christian sites in the Holy Land, are the best known.


J.

Saturday, February 28, 2004

Longing for Home

Previously, I have emphasized the importance of remaining in the here and now. I still think that needs to be our primary orientation. I don't think this means we should disregard the impact that our memories have on us in this present moment, however.

In Passion for Pilgrimage, Alan Jones offers these words;

Holy Week is a time when I am given the opportunity to reflect on how my past infects and affects my present. There are memories that refuse to come to the surface. I catch a glimpse of them out of the corner of my eye. I know that they are there, but I don't always know what they are about, except that the pain issuing from them pushes me more and more into editing my life so that only the "good bits" show. I fool myself into thinking that I live only in the present and that the past has no effect on my life right now.
We shove down the pain, the fear, the doubts, and put on a happy face. Dwelling in the dark recesses of our hearts, these images from our past are allowed to ferment and slowly find other ways to manifest themselves, unless they are brought into the light, examined, and then either embraced or released.

William Auden once said;

We would rather be ruined than changed
We would rather die in our dread
Than climb the cross of the moment
And see our illusions die.
Self-examination can be difficult, and even frightening. It seems safer to just continue to respond to life; choosing this over that without a thought as to what drives our choices; what memories and images are stamped on our souls. But then, in the wee hours of the morning, we awaken to the feeling that something is missing, that something is not quite right. We feel that longing for the illusive "something more." We want to go home, but we have forgotten the way.

I want to tell you a story about a homecoming. About twelve years ago, I became friends with a man who worked for the Social Security Administration. One day, I mentioned that I had never met my mother. My parents were divorced just before my 2nd birthday, and my mother had disappeared. My friend told me about a letter forwarding service offered by Social Security. If I knew her name and date and place of birth, their computers might be able to forward a letter to her for me. I wrote the letter, and sent it off to some government office in Baltimore.

A few months later, I received a letter back from Social Security. It basically said, "We do not know if we can forward your letter, and we will not have further communication with you regarding this letter." It was much longer than that, but told me nothing, except that it was a long shot. About what I expected from the government. I thanked my friend for his efforts, and forgot about the whole thing.

A few more months went by. One day, as I was vesting for a weekday Eucharist, the secretary of the Cathedral where I was serving came bursting into the sacristy. This was rather unusual in and of itself. What was even more unusual, however, was that the reason for this peculiar behavior was to hand-deliver a letter. We had previously discussed my attempts to involve the government in searching for my mother. Upon seeing a personal letter arrive for me in a hand-written envelope, the secretary was compelled to deliver it immediately.

I tore open the envelope and removed a few pages of yellow legal pad paper. I read the first line; "My dearest son..." I sank into a chair and allowed a flood of emotion to wash over me. Tucking the unread letter into my prayer book, I dried my eyes, blew my nose, washed my hands, and processed in for the noon Eucharist. I don't recall the homily, or who was there that day. I do remember letting loose with such a loud "Alleluia!" following the fraction that I startled the small group of faithful gathered that day. I credit good liturgical training for refraining from further exuberant expressions of my internal state. I was floating a few feet off the ground.

The letter led to some phone calls. My mother had remarried, raised two children, and was now living in Chula Vista, California. A reunion was arranged. I was to fly out to Palo Alto, meet my maternal grandmother, and my mother would join us the following day.

My mind was filled with so many wonderful images of this reunion. Finally, that longing for the missing piece of my life, that gnawing desire for "something more" was going to be satisfied. I was going home.

As I boarded the plane, I took with me the image of my mother I had so carefully preserved since my childhood. My minimal memories of her had become fashioned into a vision of a beautiful, serene, dark haired woman with a radiant smile, kind eyes, and a gentle touch. She had come to represent all that was good and true and pure to me. For some reason, she always wore blue in my vision. And was barefoot. Kind of like the Blessed Virgin, I suppose.

My grandmother and I hit it off famously. It was as if we had known each other for years. Then the time came to meet my mother at the airport. We couldn't find her. Then finally, my grandmother exclaimed, "There she is!"

I turned, and found myself facing a woman dressed in a tight black dress, with a jaunty wide-brimmed hat tipped to one side. The heavy make-up did not hide well the fact that this was obviously a woman in her sixties attempting to pass for someone much younger. My heart sank.

We returned to the car, and she began to talk to my grandmother in a loud, raspy voice. "Great," I thought. "Not only is she overdressed and wearing way too much make-up, but she's loud and obnoxious."

I tried to listen to the conversation. My heart sank even further. "...And, she's an idiot." We arrived at my grandmother's house. As we stepped out of the car, my mother lit a cigarette. And, she smokes. She went looking for something to drink, and returned with a wine cooler. And she drinks. This was not going well.

I decided this whole idea was one big mistake. I slipped away and called the airline to find out when the next plane was leaving for Wisconsin. The earliest flight was the next afternoon. I went to bed early, pleading jet-lag.

The next morning, I took my grandmother's car to the store to shop for breakfast. When I parked it, I noticed a puddle of water forming on the ground. It only took a brief investigation to diagnose the problem. The water pump was shot.

I insisted on repairing it immediately. Before going on with the story, let me make a few tangential comments about auto mechanics and water pumps.

I learned to fix cars primarily out of necessity. Before going to seminary, while working toward my undergraduate degree at night school, I supported the family as a mechanic and a forklift driver. Never having the money for a newer car, I bought old beaters, and learned how to keep them running.

Along the way, I discovered that I enjoyed being under the hood of a car. Turning wrenches became a time when I did some of my best thinking, and my most contemplative praying. The mind was busy with problem solving. The emotions were reined in. If I got frustrated or impatient, I would inevitably round off the corners of the bolt, or snap it off. If I got angry, I might decide the best solution was to get a bigger hammer; almost always a big mistake. With the mind preoccupied, and the emotions on a short leash, the Spirit would slowly begin to whisper in my ear. Each thought and every image churning somewhere below was brought to the surface, and examined in a gentle, yet detached light.

As I began removing the old water pump, I slowly became calm. Changing a water pump is one of the more pleasant tasks in the realm of auto repair. It is a simple procedure, that can be done by almost anyone. There are a few details, however, that have to be carefully addressed. The water pump is near the radiator. Care must be taken to not bump the radiator with the tools, as this can damage the copper elements, and cause a new problem; a leaking radiator.

When we try to repair our lives, sometimes we do have to take parts of them apart, and sometimes even remove and replace those things that have ceased to work, or have even become toxic. This is well and good. But care must be taken that as we are doing this work, we don't do damage to those around us as we struggle to confront our own personal demons. All the parts are interconnected. We have to pay attention to our environment.

The first couple of water pumps I replaced took a long time, because I failed to pay attention to another detail. Between the pump and the engine block is a thin gasket. Because of the heat, this gasket sometimes becomes fused to either the pump or the block. Every little piece of gasket has to be carefully removed from the block before the new pump is installed, or it will leak, and you'll have to do the job all over again. This requires time consuming and meticulously careful scraping and smoothing. The temptation to say that it is good enough before all the old gasket is removed is strong. Experience has taught me to be patient and pay careful attention to this part of the job.

In the work of self-examination, we are often tempted to not look too deeply, and believe we have done a "good enough" job of cleaning up the rough edges of our life when the reality is we may have just scratched the surface. And then we wonder why things remain such a mess; why peace somehow continues to leak away from us. We have to be patient, and pay attention to the whispers of the Spirit. Unless careful purification is done, illumination will not occur.

As I worked on my grandmother's car, and became detached from the drama of my situation, it became clear that I had a simple choice to make. I could either return home to Wisconsin, with my image of "mother' damaged but still somewhat intact (I had made no effort to really get to know this person beyond those first impressions), or, I could let go of my image, and go into the house, and meet my real mother. I could have a relationship with an image, or a real person.

After I finished repairing the water pump (which didn't leak, btw), I returned to the house, cleaned the dirt and grease from my hands, and sat down and listened to a real person. We stayed up until 5 in the morning, telling our stories, crying and laughing, pacing and hugging. That night, I lost my vision, and regained my mother.

That is basically the end of my story, but I would be remiss if I didn't add just a bit of an epilogue. I'd like to say that my mother and I lived happily ever after from that moment on. But that's the stuff of fairy tales. The reality was that we did develop a relationship, and even grew to love one another, but we never became terribly close. Too many years had passed, and we had traveled in different circles for too long. She passed away January 1, 2000. My two sons were with me as we scattered her ashes over the Pacific Ocean. The journey continues.

One last note of caution. Self-examination can be like opening Pandora's box. When I lost my image of my mother, I lost more than a false memory. I lost a part of my self identity. Longing for the love of my mother had become the driving force behind everything I had done up to that point. This image had even become wrapped up in my image of God. The God I sought was a loving, nurturing Mother.

The last twelve years have been the most difficult years of my life, even more difficult than the homeless years.. With the illusion shattered, my life fragmented, and I stumbled around seeking some grounding, some meaning and purpose to it all. The longing for "something more" remained. I still couldn't find my way home. I went through a deep depression, a difficult divorce, and a leave of absence from the active priesthood.

With the help of some good spiritual direction, therapy, various support groups, a wonderful life companion, and the grace of God, I slowly began the process of reintegrating the shattered pieces of my life. From the ashes of my broken dreams, something new is emerging.

I want to end with a few more words from Alan Jones;

The memory that holy Week seeks to revive is one that lies deep within everyone. It is the memory of our beginnings. It is the memory that enables us to remember the painful things of our past without despair. The Great Memory is simply this; God has fallen in love with you and wants you to come home! Our first memory is God's love for us, and it is this memory that has been buried and repressed. Your first memory (if only you could get back to it) is that of being God's joy and delight. Why is it difficult to remember the joy of our beginnings in the heart of God? I wonder if it has something to do with our unwillingness to face the fact of our limited future? Memory and hope are intimately related. Perhaps we cannot recall the love that brought us into being in the first place, because we cannot imagine a love strong enough to pull us through the gates of death. I refuse to remember, because I dare not hope. I refuse to remember and I dare not hope, because I am frightened and angry because I will have to change.
As Auden said, "We would rather be ruined than changed." And, that is certainly an option. We have a choice. We can hold on to our static illusions, or we can let them quietly die, and place our hope in the new thing that God might be doing in our midst; the same God who is in love with us, and is constantly calling us home.

J.

Thursday, February 26, 2004

Can a Neanderthal Emerge?

I must confess that until I stumbled across this strange world of blogdom a few months ago, I knew almost nothing about The Emerging Church. Since it seems to be the topic on so many sites that I now visit regularly, I figured it was time to look around and see what all the excitement was about.

What I discovered were some things that have been part of various discussions within the Episcopal Church for a long time, with little insight on how to implement our conclusions. I recall using materials from Loren Meade's The Once and Future Church in which he points out that we need to face the fact that we now live in a postmodern era. The ways that we "do Church" and talk about God have needed to be reconsidered for a long time.

I will readily admit that I began exploring the emerging church with a particular bias; I really love the Episcopal Church, and I doubted if I would find much involvement in this within our tradition. I was pleasantly surprised to find The Church of the Apostles in Seattle doing some quite innovative things, while honoring our tradition. This is a congregation that is Episcopalian and Lutheran; one of the few successful mergings that I have heard about since we entered into full communion with the ELCA a few years ago. Karen Ward appears to be a gifted leader. This is a really exciting place!

Looking further, I found The Church of the Beloved in Charlotte. As it turns out, Derek and I were in seminary together. I had lunch with him a few years ago in Charlotte when he was doing church planting and I had just started doing interim work. Now I understand a little better what he was trying to tell me, and why he was so full of enthusiasm!

I want to continue to look at this a bit closer. Being an incurable bookworm, I'll probably start with a couple of books; The Emerging Church and one from the Alban Institute, The Postmodern Parish.

I wonder how a cave dwelling modernist like myself might be helpful? Is there a place for a doddering old priest in a black cassock with a prayer book under his arm? I don't drool too much, and I can swing a mean thurible.

J.

Via Negativa

While hunting for other things, I stumbled across this piece. It resonates strongly with me today. I think I'll shut up now, and let it speak for itself:

On Giving Up

I gave up negative remarks for Lent,
It took the whole first week
for me to grasp
this single imperfection.
But then it came,
served up on its little platter
neat as an omelet: NO VIA NEGATIVA
FOR SIX WEEKS. TRY IT,
YOU’LL LIKE IT.

Indeed, it sobers me
to hear myself complain:
I rise to praise all sun and water
flowing over rock, seek out wines
to go with pasta. And wit --
I’ll never have enough of wit,
it radiates good vibes.

And yet, re: sober thoughts:
what’s wrong with no, not, isn’t,
never will: They have their truth:
God said, I AM, but
so am I,
and I’m not God. Nor,
as far as I can see,
is any other name now known:

God IS but thrives on being ISN’T,
and in just such terrifying,
nonaffirming ways as ours,
who probe the dark, then stumble,
then cry out in heaps of helplessness.

I ponder thus on Thursday of Week Six.

-- Sr. Mary Virginia Micka, CSJ
St. Paul, Minn.


J.

Wednesday, February 25, 2004

Remember that you are dust...

Dear People of God: The first Christians observed with great devotion the days of our Lord’s passion and resurrection, and it became the custom of the Church to prepare for them by a season of penitence and fasting. This season of Lent provided a time in which converts to the faith were prepared for Holy Baptism. It was also a time when those who, because of notorious sins, had been separated from the body of the faithful were reconciled by penitence and forgiveness, and restored to the fellowship of the Church. Thereby, the whole congregation was put in mind of the message of pardon and absolution set forth in the Gospel of our Savior, and of the need which all Christians continually have to renew their repentance and faith.

I invite you, therefore, in the name of the Church, to the observance of a holy Lent, by self-examination and repentance; by prayer, fasting and self-denial; and by reading and meditating on God’s holy Word. And, to make a right beginning of repentance, and as a symbol of our mortal nature, let us now kneel before the Lord, our maker and redeemer.

- The Book of Common Prayer, p. 265.


Ash Wednesday marks the beginning of our Lenten journey. It finds its root in the story of Jesus’ forty days in the desert. One way to look at Lent is to consider it our own desert pilgrimage.

We begin our journey by receiving a mark on our foreheads with ash, accompanied by the words, “Remember that you are dust, and to dust you shall return.” Placing ashes on one’s head is something we see in the scriptures that was done when someone is in deep dismay, or is devastated by something they have done to another. It is a sign of penitence.

In our Christian tradition, we place these ashes on the same place on our foreheads that we were marked as Christ’s own forever when we were baptized. This season of Lent is a continuation of a journey that began when we were baptized.

The ashes also remind us of our own mortality. We too shall return to the dust. But as Christians, as people of the Resurrection, we understand that in death life is changed, not ended. We note our own mortal nature, and are encouraged to see that now is the acceptable time of the Lord; now is the time to live this life to its fullest, to become all God would have us be.

To do that; to live into the promises made at our baptism, we need to consider another aspect of the symbolism of this day. Ashes are a sign of purification. Metals are purified and tempered in a hot fire. So our lives need to be also purified and tempered.

The season of Lent is an invitation to enter the desert; to let go of some of our activities and discover the time for a desert journey; an inward journey; a journey into repentance.

Repentance is about reoriented our lives toward God. If we are not careful, if we don’t take the time for this inward journey of self examination, it becomes quite easy for us to take our focus off of God. Very slowly, without realizing it, our lives can become oriented toward some other primary thing; maybe our career, or financial security; or even a hobby. These things, in and of themselves, are not harmful. But, if we are not careful, we can become fixated on them, to the exclusion of other things, including the exclusion of God.

During this season of Lent, we are invited to take the time to look deep within ourselves, to look for the walls we may have built between ourselves and God. We ask ourselves; “What is blocking the way for me to develop a deeper relationship with God?”

We have to make space for this interior work. Making such a space is often called acts of self-denial, or fasting. We put something down to make room in our busy lives to pick something up. I am suggesting to you that one thing that we might want to “pick up” is time in the desert; time for self-examination; time to look within the crooks and crannies of our lives and seek the things that are hindering our relationship with God.

Some people find using more of their day in prayer; including a time of silence, to be a helpful tool for self-examination. Others may also free up time in their day for the study of scripture or other devotional reading. Some find acts of mercy and almsgiving to be helpful.

The first important step in observing a holy Lent is participation in the liturgy for Ash Wednesday. I encourage you to not pass up this opportunity to travel with Jesus into the desert. This is the point of Ash Wednesday and Lent. We are invited to take a desert journey; an interior journey, and discover where our relationship with God is fed and where it is not. We can then repent; reorient our lives back toward God. If we have done this honestly, sincerely and carefully, the joy that will await us on the other side of our Lenten journey will be amazing!

May we observe a holy Lent, resulting in abundant Easter joy.

J.